Connectivity explains ecosystem responses to rainfall, drought
Above: Praveen Kumar, left, and former graduate student Allison Goodwell, who is currently a civil engineering professor at the University of Colorado, Denver, studied the connectivity between ecosystem responses to rainfall and drought. Photo courtesy Praveen Kumar
By Lois Yoksoulian
In a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers reveal techniques – inspired by the study of information theory – to track how changes in precipitation alter interactions between the atmosphere, vegetation and soil at two National Science Foundation Critical Zone Observatory sites in the western United States.
“Information arising from fluctuations in rainfall moves through ecosystems, similar to the way that information flows through communication networks,” said Praveen Kumar, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and study co-author. “This type of analysis, which is new to ecological and hydrological studies, lets us determine how well different aspects of an ecosystem are connected and whether responses to changes in climate are site-specific or common across different ecosystems.”
The researchers looked at changes in heat, soil moisture and carbon flow – known as fluxes – before, during and after rainfall and drought events in two locations. The first site, in southwestern Idaho, experienced several days of rainfall during July 2015. The second, in the Southern Sierra region of California, experienced a multiyear drought starting in 2012.
“At the Idaho site, we saw increased connectivity between the atmosphere and soil in the period directly after the rainfall,” said Allison Goodwell, a civil engineering professor at the University of Colorado, Denver who is a former Illinois graduate student and lead author of the new study. “At the Southern Sierra site, we found that heat and carbon fluxes responded to the drought in different ways, and that sources of connectivity varied between high- and low-elevation sites.”
“Another aspect that made this study unique was the availability of data from multiple stations at different elevations at each site,” Kumar said. “This allowed us to see if the changes in connectivity were due to climate differences resulting from elevation. Normally, the data collection stations are isolated, making it difficult to perform this type of comparative analysis.”
Although the field sites and data are from different ecosystems, times and weather disturbances, the study provides insight into how connectivity influences different types of fluxes, the researchers said. Stronger connectivity alters how rainfall affects moisture, heat and carbon flux in the system, and the progression from early to late-stage drought.
“These results show the ways in which a watershed may respond to precipitation disturbances, in this case drought,” said Richard Yuretich, the program director for the NSF Critical Zone Observatories. “The information is important to predicting how ecosystems will respond to future extreme events.”
Aaron Fellows and Gerald Flerchinger from the U.S. Department of Agriculture also contributed to this research.
The National Science Foundation Grant for the Critical Zone Observatory for Intensively Managed Landscapes and the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship supported this research.
To reach Praveen Kumar, call 217-300-4688; firstname.lastname@example.org.
To reach Allison Goodwell, call 303-315-7499; email@example.com.
The paper “Dynamic process connectivity explains ecohydrologic responses to rainfall pulses and drought” is available online and from the U. of I. News Bureau.